President Trump says trade wars are easy to win. But that depends on his definition of winning.
Here’s how China is redefining that term for itself …
The Chinese government announced in December that state agencies must begin replacing foreign-made PCs and software, according to a report from the Financial Times.
While this may not seem like a big deal, the directive is expected to impact 20 million to 30 million pieces of hardware scheduled for replacement in 2020.
It’s also a direct attack on Microsoft, the company behind the dominant Windows operating system.
More important, it sets the stage for a great tech balkanization — two business silos dominated by Chinese and American interests.
These markets will be smaller … and even more competitive.
This process began last May when the U.S. Department of Commerce announced that it would impose a blacklist on Huawei, the world’s largest telecommunications equipment company.
This blacklisting meant American companies were effectively barred from doing business with Huawei.
In theory, the strategy would starve the Chinese conglomerate from the components it badly needed to build state-of-the art gear. This was supposed to be a death blow.
However, last week Huawei noted that its newest Mate 30 smartphone did not have any U.S.-made components.
All components of the new Mate 30 smartphone were either developed in-house or purchased from non-U.S. firms.
This is no small accomplishment, given the cutting-edge device is widely considered the most technologically advanced on the market.
The Mate 30 also competes head to head with iPhone 11, Apple’s flagship device.
Chin’s new “3-5-2 Plan” will see state agencies drastically reduce their reliance of American-made technology. Chinese divisions must reduce the purchase of U.S.-made goods by 30% in 2020, 50% in 2021 and another 20% in 2022.
The directives are aggressive, and they are potentially devastating for companies like Hewlett-Packard, Dell, Intel and Microsoft.
And they are not the only U.S.-based companies in peril …
China is fast-becoming the world’s largest consumer market. Companies as diverse as Boeing, Starbucks, Ford and the leading money-center banks depend on the market for growth.
Forbes reported May 2018 that a number of American businesses and sectors have made substantial investments in China. A sudden change of course by the state could throw a wrench into everything.
I have been cautious about the trade war since it began two years ago. Pushing Chinese state-sponsored agencies to go without American-made goods and services was always a recipe for greater Chinese innovation.
Regardless of politics and endgames, lost markets were inevitable.
It’s more worrisome is that the White House doesn’t seem to care about those lost markets …
President Trump believes Facebook, Alphabet and Amazon.com have been against his presidency from the beginning, according to a June Business Insider story. He sees tech leadership as political foes. There is very little incentive for him to expend his political capital to help.
The best technology investment may be in companies with almost no presence in China, and beyond President Trump’s radar. Companies like …
Mastercard have no substantial business in China. But that’s not for lack of trying. The company submitted an application in 2018 to process payments in renminbi, the local Chinese currency. The state government didn’t even bother to act on the application.
No matter. The rest of the business is solid, if not well-understood.
This New York company is a pure transaction processor. It carries no credit risk. And it is not really subject to the ebbs and flows of the economy.
See, the goal is to marginalize cash.
Mastercard’s business is pushing more of the world’s transactions — from something as simple as a purchase at a local mall or transferring a government payment — toward digital processing.
As consumers move toward smart devices and online banking, this business is only getting better.
A 2017 report from global management consulting firm McKinsey & Co. forecast that global payments would reach $2 trillion in 2020, two years faster than previously expected. Analysts pegged the 2022 threshold at $3 trillion.
Some 40 billion devices will be interconnected within a decade. Gas pumps and carwashes will hook up with the computers in cars. Everything will share a connection with encrypted, personal financial information stored away in the cloud.
Right now, only a few companies have the scale to pull that off.
Mastercard is one of those businesses.
Shares trade at 33.8x forward earnings for a market capitalization of $293 billion. That is reasonable given where transaction processing is headed, and Mastercard’s position as an industry leader.
The shares could easily move to $425 by 2021 from its current perch at $290 as price/earnings multiples expand further.
That’s nearly a 50% potential increase over the next year.
The U.S.-China trade war is going to be a big problem for technology companies. Investors are being lackadaisical.
Use strength to sell semiconductor, software and computer hardware companies.
And consider using weakness to begin accumulating a position in Mastercard.
2019-12-29 03:23:29Z
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonmarkman/2019/12/28/heres-how-mastercard-sidesteps-the-us-anti-tech-campaign/
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Here’s How Mastercard Sidesteps The U.S. Anti-Tech Campaign - Forbes"
Post a Comment